10 Mile Diet


4 Comments

If “consenting adults” works for sex, why not milk?

As soon as I started my 10-mile diet I became a criminal. No, not local marijuana (which now is legal in Washington). Local milk. Selling milk to your neighbor from your cow or goat is against the law.

I’m thinking about it today because the FDA just announced new food safety standards, saying we should prevent contamination rather than just react to outbreaks. This means further regulations, many so costly that small producers can’t reasonably comply. I’m all for the nation’s food supply being safe – but this ruling raises a concern. Hear me out. And tell me if I am off base. Please!

Raw milk – good for you, bad for you?

Raw milk is regulated by states, and the battle to legalize the sale of it has many fronts. Most advocates believe raw milk is better for your health because beneficial enzymes are destroyed with pasteurization. Most detractors say the milk, if not properly handled, can make you very sick and should not be sold right from the cow or goat. Pasteurization kills off the pathogens and protects the milk supply for the nation.

After much research – inconclusive since each side is adamant about their arguments – I stand somewhere else. It’s about sovereignty, subsidiarity and small farmer prosperity.

I believe that “neighbor to neighbor” trade of food should be exempt from the stringent – and costly – licensing and regulations that keeps the big guys in line, while still holding the little guys accountable to their customers for the quality of their product.

Organic in fact but not in label?

Most of my local farmers grow organically but they don’t sell their food as organic because they can’t afford to pay the fees for licenses and for inspectors to come out at required intervals. They are already at a disadvantage financially. Small scale hand raised food is inherently more expensive than large scale, highly subsidized, mechanized or undocumented workers harvested, factory processed food. Most of my local farmers have excellent procedures for harvesting, washing and packaging their food. First, they care. Second, their reputation is shot if even one person gets sick. This is performance based evaluation (people don’t get sick, the food is healthy and fresh) versus regulation based assurances (the inspector was on site to verify compliance). Third it behooves all of us to have thriving small scale agriculture in our regions.

I’m not objecting to food that travels more than 50-100 miles (a decent measure for accountability) from farm to fork being regulated to assure safety. Milk, for example, leaves regulated farms in large tankers and is combined at the bottling plant – we have NO way to know whose cow our milk comes from. Absolutely!

Why I trust my neighbor as much as the FDA

But my neighbor who sold me their one cow’s milk is a different story. I as a consumer want to legally buy that milk because:

  1. I trust this neighbor
  2. I really like the  milk – way more delicious than the store milk
  3. I want this neighbor – and all my neighbors – to be able to earn money legally from what they produce at this small scale, enough to pay taxes and buy clothes and buy what they can’t produce. This is how we lived just a few generations ago!

Mechanisms for assurance

Because of this, I am willing to sign a consent form assuming personal responsibility for my choice. Alcohol kills yet it’s legal. Cigarettes kill yet they are legal. Couldn’t we require warning labels on local milk and/or require customers to sign a waiver? If you work out at a gym you sign a waiver; you hold yourself, not the gym, responsible for your sprains and bruises. You are taking your health into your own hands. Why not something similar with milk you buy from a neighbor’s cow? Or perhaps you need to prove that the buyer is a neighbor. You take their address. Or perhaps you have to prove that they are a personal friend. You get an existing customer to cosign for them. All this is in the realm of reasonable when you are dealing with people in community.

Why it’s important

Why do we need to bring this kind of trade above ground? Because more producers and consumers can benefit. It builds the local food capacity. Why is this important? Here are reasons that make sense to me:

  1. If we don’t want to participate in the food industrial complex, we can opt out without opting out of foods we love
  2. Industrial food is not inherently safer! According the FDA’s own press release “The burden of foodborne illness in the United States is substantial. One in six Americans suffer from a foodborne illness every year. Of those, nearly 130,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 die from their illness. Preventing foodborne illnesses will improve public health, reduce medical costs, and avoid the costly disruptions of the food system caused by illness outbreaks and large-scale recalls.” One in six!
  3. If you believe that raw milk is better for you and your children, you can purchase it. Most countries do not ban the sale of raw milk.
  4. If you believe that regional food security is important, you allow more very small scale producers to enter the market. If they scale up beyond several cows or a dozen goats, their customers will likely not be their friends and neighbors and so stricter regulations would kick in.
  5. If you don’t want your beautiful rural community overtaken by mono crops and mega corps and big box shopping plazas, then small scale producers have to have a shot at making a decent living. Growing peppermint is one things. Drying it and selling tea sachets is another. The value of the peppermint goes up astronomically.  Raising, slaughtering and butchering animals for home consumption is one thing. Being able to sell roasts and chops to your neighbors without a USDA inspector watching (at your expense) makes those animals a small income stream as well as dinner.

Subsidiarity

Subsidiarity is a principle that says that problems are best solved closest to those affected. We need the UN to debate global issues like climate change and rights of women. We need national governments to preserve the rights for all citizens – and regulate our food and drug supply – and review rulings for constitutionality – and level the economic playing field, busting up monopolies, enabling entrepreneurs, using taxes to encourage beneficial action and constrain greed . We need state governments to innovate, regulate and respond to regional needs. But on the matter of neighbor to neighbor trade, we need local adaptations. There can be community review boards. There can be covenants and ordinances to provide some protections. But we can assume that people have common sense and allow them to make their own considered decisions about buying milk, eggs, cheese, meat, vegetables and herbs. Most of that is already legal without draconian costs to the producers.

How does this strike you? Why do you believe as you do? Where are you willing to risk for personal freedom and where do you believe it’s right to regulate?

All this from the desire for a spot of milk in my tea in the morning. But such is the unfolding of wisdom, starting from a small seed or irritant, and growing into mighty issues and insights.


Leave a comment

Nourishment versus calories

A friend, hearing the topic of my book, said she had a lot of stories to tell about her own bulimia, anorexia and body. I realized this is the obvious first thought when you say you’ve written a book about food. Here’s what I wrote back. What do you think? How would you say it?

My food work is NOT about the many aspects of personal food dysfunction. it starts there (as i am a child of my food culture) but is really about our relationship with nourishment – and the hands and lands that bring that to us. it is to fall in love with food as the source of our lives, and to pull back the curtain to reveal the systems – healthy and unhealthy – that produce that magic of stocked shelves and colorful farmer’s markets. to mend the disconnection with our communities via food. 

I have many thoughts about nourishment versus calories. More on that as time goes on.


Leave a comment

Subversive gardening

Roger is funny, clear and connects the dots between population growth, shrinking resources, obesity in a world of hunger, and the possibility that turning our lawns into lunch (vegetables) is a doable revolution. All in 18 minutes. Also, read the comments – some reveal how resistant folks are to simple, self-generated food solutions. What’s with that?


Leave a comment

What’s a complementary food system?

The food systems that feed us – natural and national – are like the glass pieces in a kaleidoscope. I turn my head this way and that, trying for a whole picture. I think I’m beginning to see it, but still, as Paul in the Bible said, “through a glass darkly.”

Last week I tried explaining my current understanding to a very well informed acquaintance. The piece about complementary food systems had her puzzled.

I use that term for the possibility and importance of regenerating regional agricultural capacity.Right now, we have spotty capacity, unequal to the job of feeding the people. We are highly reliant on industrial agriculture.

In medicine, natural remedies and modalities were at first labeled quackery,  then alternative and now, with much research and demand, complementary. Massage and chiropractic and homeopathy and naturopathy are included in many insurance plans and recognized as part of the range of effective treatments. Small scale family farms and market gardens are currently sidelines in our food system, little protected and left to compete with industrial food on an unequal playing field. Here’s what I wrote to this acquaintance:

Our conversation helped me clarify the idea of a complementary food system and how it’s just a name for building regional food production, processing and distribution capacity. I want people to see that it is possible – though very challenging – to restore the vitality of our regional food system. In 1950 (my lifetime!!!) most food eaten in western WA was grown here.

We live in the midst of a supply chain miracle aided by fossil fuels and corporate consolidation and vertical integration and agricultural inputs and nano tech and Reaganomics and a lot more. Every innovation seemed to make life better (better living through chemistry) but to me there is a sorcerer’s apprentice quality of what we have now. we are beginning to drown in the unintended consequences of a system no one really can grasp anymore.

With relocalization as a lens you start to map a system you can actually see and influence. Not reject the good and necessary of the industrial system but begin to see gaps and opportunities, begin to define for ourselves our goals for our productivity, begin to see where we can stop being complicit with what we don’t choose for ourselves and families. it’s not the new “right way” – it’s just a lens that animates my creativity and desire to participate.

Also, I lived in an intentional community for 3 decades and it trained me to think in terms of the collective well being, knowing through experience that my life gets easier and better if i am attending to the needs of the system in which i live. it is a unique lens. old hippies have this in their experience for sure, not many doggedly followed the path into this millennium.

Through the lens of individualism – our western miracle of myopia – the industrial system looks okay. “Works for me” as we say. Through a community lens, though, it is ravaging the living biotic and social systems that real people in real communities ultimately depend on not just for food but for love and belonging and meaning. I think this is why I am following this inkling to see where it goes.


Leave a comment

Talking with my mouth full

Friday night my mouth was fullStitched Panorama of spoken words, aimed at introducing relational eating to interested eaters. I was at the Geodome at the Seattle Center and spoke after the audience of 25 had toured the Universe through the magic of the Geodome software beamed on the inflatable intimate “planetaium”. Everything was a wow. The show and my talk.

Writing a book is not the same as giving a pithy 1-hour talk you hope will move, amuse and motivate folks. I think I found my groove – or at least saw the on ramp in the distance.

Blessing the Hands that Feed Us is in the capable hands of the editors at Viking/Penguin, but in the year between now and publication I want to speak with groups and audiences in workshops and conferences and grocery store lines. I want to craft potent language that will…

  • get people laughing and crying and thinking and scheming
  • pull back the Wizard of Oz screen on our food system,
  • evoke the inner and outer power of relational eating (eating in the context of a living system),
  • reveal why local is important and how it can actually “scale sideways” so that we can again feed our people closer to home.

I hope to offer a talk in your sector of the heavens – to keep the Universe metaphor – and see your smiling faces somewhere in my travels. I hope by the end of this year of waiting I’ll actually have a pearl of a talk to offer you and your communities.


Leave a comment

I’m pleased to report that I am, once again, done

On Wednesday, just in time for Thanksgiving, I put the last correction requested by the publisher into the manuscript, added the last endnote, wrote the last informational box and – somewhat dazed – discovered myself at the end of the long list of editing tasks and… dare I say … done! I’ve felt done two other times this year. Once when I sent the finished first draft to Viking/Penguin June 1. Once when I sent the book (sans info boxes, recipes, other frills) to the publisher on September 1 and now, having entered the hundreds of edits from the publisher and having written all the new material requested.
Join me in a simple prayer. That I am done done done. And join me in another simple prayer. That the book now has a smooth journey down the book birth canal and comes out healthy, happy and completely irresistable… before the end of the coming year.